The Best in Restaurants, Theater and Entertainment
Dining with Terrorists - Return of the Freedom Fighter -Pt 1
Filed under: Dining Out

In this episode, Phil Rees travels to Northern Ireland and Lebanon and concludes that before the ‘war on terror’ can have its Armistice Day, the West will have to negotiate with those it considers terrorists.

Duration : 0:12:41


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

admin @ 12:32 am

25 Comments for 'Dining with Terrorists - Return of the Freedom Fighter -Pt 1'

  1.  
    ParamoreWorshipper
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    Loughall, they shot …
    Loughall, they shot a man and his brother.

  2.  
    turtleshellable
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    no idiot …
    no idiot britain will leave if people leave so tuc tuc

  3.  
    turtleshellable
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    stop america
    stop america

  4.  
    turtleshellable
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    cool war
    cool war

  5.  
    ravingjunkey
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    Who did SAS shoot …
    Who did SAS shoot dead that was innocent? Soruce’s please, sources.

  6.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    where did i say …
    where did i say that?

    i know the SAS claimed they’d arrest IRA members but really they’d shoot them dead when they were unarmed like cowardly s.

  7.  
    ravingjunkey
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    IRA didn’t target …
    IRA didn’t target SAS.

  8.  
    a05bf5ff
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    do u reckon bolton …
    do u reckon bolton actually believes the bullshit he says?

  9.  
    fgwakely
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    goverments are the …
    goverments are the largest terrorist organisation around

  10.  
    ciaranfox2008
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    UP THE RA
    UP THE RA

  11.  
    MW2772
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    There is a …
    There is a difference between demanding foreign military forces leave your country and not wanting any sort of relations with the West

  12.  
    canyonerodriver
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    the us army …
    the us army terrorises on a greater scale than any other organisation

  13.  
    ParamoreWorshipper
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    The Troubles …
    The Troubles weren’t about religion either.
    It’s what started it, but the main goal became a United Ireland, supported by Catholics and Protestants.
    Britian agreed to leave in the future if attacks stopped.

  14.  
    1stGenRefugee
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    Bolton can choke on …
    Bolton can choke on the barrel of my ak47

  15.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    well see i …
    well see i understand that.

    Ireland was occupied by the British empire that brought nothing but death to civilians… as that guy said, we picked up the gun for a reason.

    At one point in Ireland’s past, Irish Catholics could not receive an education, could not hold in office, could not vote, and the list goes on.. we were denied basic human rights and we were being killed by British loyalist gangs and not many people know that… look up “the troubles”

  16.  
    gtoure
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    It’s not really …
    It’s not really about religion; that’s the lie we’re told. It’s political. As this documentary shows, the radicals are responding to the occupation of their land as they have been for decades. They don’t want us to convert to Islam, they just want us to get out of THEIR country, and end the trade embargoes on the region.

  17.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    i was under the …
    i was under the impression that Osama hated Americans like those radicals that chop off heads of journalists because they’re not of their religion.

  18.  
    gtoure
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    That’s true, you …
    That’s true, you did qualify your statement by saying you didn’t really know what you were talking about. I wasn’t attacking you or your position, just trying to get you to think beyond what the news feeds us.

    It’s not about who flew the planes; it’s about who gave the order and why. who benefited most from 9/11? Osama (in a cave hiding or dead) or Cheney (super-rich off military contracts)?

  19.  
    LeedansParis
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    8:08 WORD!!!
    8:08 WORD!!!

  20.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    i dont know how …
    i dont know how well you can read, but at the begining of the message i said “i dont know much about the topic”.

    and who do you think flew the planes thhen eh? bush himself?

  21.  
    gtoure
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    The 9/11 attacks …
    The 9/11 attacks were blamed on Al-Qaeda, not the Taliban… and despite what CNN and Fox say, there is very little evidence either group was actually involved. I’m surprised there are people who still believe that on YouTube… do a little digging, my friend

  22.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    no i mean mass …
    no i mean mass killing american civilians… i dont know much about the taliban subject honestly… i know they flew two planes into two large towers in nyc, america, and they killed thousands of innocent people who had done nothing to them.

  23.  
    Muraabit
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    I know, but the …
    I know, but the Taliban asked for evidence in order to hand over Osama Bin Laden and because of moral duty, they simply couldn’t betray one of their own brothers who was immediately accused of masterminding the 9/11 attacks by handing him over without evidence and I believe the Taliban was right. As for mass killings, the Taliban don’t kill their own people except in the course of justice prescribed on them and they have the right to repel the enemy forces by all means.

  24.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    yet.. your on an …
    yet.. your on an american site.

  25.  
    mugmugmug11
    August 1, 2009 | 12:32 am
     

    true, but the IRA …
    true, but the IRA never intended to mass kill civilians like driving planes into tall buildings.

    Their targets were Loyalist gangs, British Army/SAS, and some British government officials.. they sought no merit in killing people that caused no harm to them or their campaign.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI

 
Theme by Robert
Theme designed by
- -
Downloaded from